<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Early reports of Virtualization on Intel&#160;Macs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blurbomat.com/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blurbomat.com/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs/</link>
	<description>Jon Armstrong shares photos, music, politics, hair &#38; pants.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: marymuses</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-1635</link>
		<dc:creator>marymuses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 21:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/wp/archives/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs#comment-1635</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really not much into the technical side of things (this is why I date an Apple Genius, so I can stay stupid), but from my perspective Aperture was great aside from being a bit slow on some things (I was using the G5 tower at the store, too).  It might just be me, but I found it to be more user-friendly than Photoshop, and my workflow was MUCH smoother than when I use Photoshop.  The fact that you&#039;d need a good deal of RAM to run it is a definite drawback, but if you&#039;ve got the option to upgrade your machine once the G5 is no longer the top of the line, it might be something worth looking into further.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really not much into the technical side of things (this is why I date an Apple Genius, so I can stay stupid), but from my perspective Aperture was great aside from being a bit slow on some things (I was using the G5 tower at the store, too).  It might just be me, but I found it to be more user-friendly than Photoshop, and my workflow was MUCH smoother than when I use Photoshop.  The fact that you&#8217;d need a good deal of RAM to run it is a definite drawback, but if you&#8217;ve got the option to upgrade your machine once the G5 is no longer the top of the line, it might be something worth looking into further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: la_florecita</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-1634</link>
		<dc:creator>la_florecita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 05:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/wp/archives/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs#comment-1634</guid>
		<description>You want a Macbook??  I applied to an Apple Store opening soon in town just so I could get the discount.

Yup, Bachelor of Arts + 6 years of design experience and I want to work in a mall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You want a Macbook??  I applied to an Apple Store opening soon in town just so I could get the discount.</p>
<p>Yup, Bachelor of Arts + 6 years of design experience and I want to work in a mall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omar</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-1633</link>
		<dc:creator>omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 02:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/wp/archives/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs#comment-1633</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s sick, booting XP in 10 seconds!  

Regarding Aperture, I say go for Adobe Lightroom instead.  It&#039;s not as pretty, but it&#039;s still good, and doesn&#039;t have absurd system requirements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s sick, booting XP in 10 seconds!  </p>
<p>Regarding Aperture, I say go for Adobe Lightroom instead.  It&#8217;s not as pretty, but it&#8217;s still good, and doesn&#8217;t have absurd system requirements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy D.</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-1632</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 01:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/wp/archives/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs#comment-1632</guid>
		<description>mmmmmmm   MacBook Pro.

Too bad my PowerBook is only a year and a halfish old....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mmmmmmm   MacBook Pro.</p>
<p>Too bad my PowerBook is only a year and a halfish old&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blurb</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-1631</link>
		<dc:creator>blurb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/wp/archives/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs#comment-1631</guid>
		<description>Apeture, no. I tried it out on a top end G5 tower at the Apple store and the interface was pretty slow for some things. I think you&#039;d need as much RAM as your machine could hold. This was the version 1.0, so the speed issues may have been addressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apeture, no. I tried it out on a top end G5 tower at the Apple store and the interface was pretty slow for some things. I think you&#8217;d need as much RAM as your machine could hold. This was the version 1.0, so the speed issues may have been addressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-1630</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 18:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/wp/archives/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs#comment-1630</guid>
		<description>I am writing this from my new 20&quot; Intel-iMac.  Here is my advice.  If you get the &quot;free with rebate&quot; printer, DON&#039;T use the install disk!  The install disk isn&#039;t for intel based macs, and I nearly lost my mind trying to figure out why Photoshop wouldn&#039;t open anymore!  Adobe had no clue, Apple had no clue.  I still don&#039;t know how I figured it out.  

I originally really wanted the macbook, but the iMac had so much more inside that I couldn&#039;t justifiy paying more for less, especially since I already have an iBook.  (I&#039;m really just waiting for the logic board to fail for the fourth time so I can use it as a paperweight.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am writing this from my new 20&#8243; Intel-iMac.  Here is my advice.  If you get the &#8220;free with rebate&#8221; printer, DON&#8217;T use the install disk!  The install disk isn&#8217;t for intel based macs, and I nearly lost my mind trying to figure out why Photoshop wouldn&#8217;t open anymore!  Adobe had no clue, Apple had no clue.  I still don&#8217;t know how I figured it out.  </p>
<p>I originally really wanted the macbook, but the iMac had so much more inside that I couldn&#8217;t justifiy paying more for less, especially since I already have an iBook.  (I&#8217;m really just waiting for the logic board to fail for the fourth time so I can use it as a paperweight.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: di</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-1629</link>
		<dc:creator>di</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 18:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/wp/archives/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs#comment-1629</guid>
		<description>You and me both! I&#039;m just waiting for round two when things are more stable and more software is available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You and me both! I&#8217;m just waiting for round two when things are more stable and more software is available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhotographerLori</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-1628</link>
		<dc:creator>PhotographerLori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 17:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/wp/archives/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs#comment-1628</guid>
		<description>I have a quick MAC question.  Have you used Apeture?  Heard anything about it?  Some of my photographer friends are not impressed, but I see some things that sound good.  I like the design control of the books too.  Any input?  

LORI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a quick MAC question.  Have you used Apeture?  Heard anything about it?  Some of my photographer friends are not impressed, but I see some things that sound good.  I like the design control of the books too.  Any input?  </p>
<p>LORI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

