<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Early reports of Virtualization on Intel Macs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blurbomat.com/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blurbomat.com/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs/</link>
	<description>Jon Armstrong shares photos, music, politics, hair &#38; pants.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 12:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: marymuses</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-1635</link>
		<dc:creator>marymuses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 21:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/wp/archives/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs#comment-1635</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really not much into the technical side of things (this is why I date an Apple Genius, so I can stay stupid), but from my perspective Aperture was great aside from being a bit slow on some things (I was using the G5 tower at the store, too).  It might just be me, but I found it to be more user-friendly than Photoshop, and my workflow was MUCH smoother than when I use Photoshop.  The fact that you&#039;d need a good deal of RAM to run it is a definite drawback, but if you&#039;ve got the option to upgrade your machine once the G5 is no longer the top of the line, it might be something worth looking into further.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m really not much into the technical side of things (this is why I date an Apple Genius, so I can stay stupid), but from my perspective Aperture was great aside from being a bit slow on some things (I was using the G5 tower at the store, too).  It might just be me, but I found it to be more user-friendly than Photoshop, and my workflow was MUCH smoother than when I use Photoshop.  The fact that you’d need a good deal of RAM to run it is a definite drawback, but if you’ve got the option to upgrade your machine once the G5 is no longer the top of the line, it might be something worth looking into further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: la_florecita</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-1634</link>
		<dc:creator>la_florecita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 05:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/wp/archives/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs#comment-1634</guid>
		<description>You want a Macbook??  I applied to an Apple Store opening soon in town just so I could get the discount.

Yup, Bachelor of Arts + 6 years of design experience and I want to work in a mall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You want a Macbook??  I applied to an Apple Store opening soon in town just so I could get the discount.</p>
<p>Yup, Bachelor of Arts + 6 years of design experience and I want to work in a mall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omar</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-1633</link>
		<dc:creator>omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 02:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/wp/archives/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs#comment-1633</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s sick, booting XP in 10 seconds!  

Regarding Aperture, I say go for Adobe Lightroom instead.  It&#039;s not as pretty, but it&#039;s still good, and doesn&#039;t have absurd system requirements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That’s sick, booting XP in 10 seconds!  </p>
<p>Regarding Aperture, I say go for Adobe Lightroom instead.  It’s not as pretty, but it’s still good, and doesn’t have absurd system requirements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy D.</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-1632</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 01:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/wp/archives/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs#comment-1632</guid>
		<description>mmmmmmm   MacBook Pro.

Too bad my PowerBook is only a year and a halfish old....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mmmmmmm   MacBook Pro.</p>
<p>Too bad my PowerBook is only a year and a halfish old.…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blurb</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-1631</link>
		<dc:creator>blurb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/wp/archives/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs#comment-1631</guid>
		<description>Apeture, no. I tried it out on a top end G5 tower at the Apple store and the interface was pretty slow for some things. I think you&#039;d need as much RAM as your machine could hold. This was the version 1.0, so the speed issues may have been addressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apeture, no. I tried it out on a top end G5 tower at the Apple store and the interface was pretty slow for some things. I think you’d need as much RAM as your machine could hold. This was the version 1.0, so the speed issues may have been addressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-1630</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 18:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/wp/archives/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs#comment-1630</guid>
		<description>I am writing this from my new 20&quot; Intel-iMac.  Here is my advice.  If you get the &quot;free with rebate&quot; printer, DON&#039;T use the install disk!  The install disk isn&#039;t for intel based macs, and I nearly lost my mind trying to figure out why Photoshop wouldn&#039;t open anymore!  Adobe had no clue, Apple had no clue.  I still don&#039;t know how I figured it out.  

I originally really wanted the macbook, but the iMac had so much more inside that I couldn&#039;t justifiy paying more for less, especially since I already have an iBook.  (I&#039;m really just waiting for the logic board to fail for the fourth time so I can use it as a paperweight.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am writing this from my new 20″ Intel-iMac.  Here is my advice.  If you get the “free with rebate” printer, DON’T use the install disk!  The install disk isn’t for intel based macs, and I nearly lost my mind trying to figure out why Photoshop wouldn’t open anymore!  Adobe had no clue, Apple had no clue.  I still don’t know how I figured it out.  </p>
<p>I originally really wanted the macbook, but the iMac had so much more inside that I couldn’t justifiy paying more for less, especially since I already have an iBook.  (I’m really just waiting for the logic board to fail for the fourth time so I can use it as a paperweight.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: di</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-1629</link>
		<dc:creator>di</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 18:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/wp/archives/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs#comment-1629</guid>
		<description>You and me both! I&#039;m just waiting for round two when things are more stable and more software is available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You and me both! I’m just waiting for round two when things are more stable and more software is available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhotographerLori</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs/comment-page-1/#comment-1628</link>
		<dc:creator>PhotographerLori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 17:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/wp/archives/2006/04/10/early-reports-of-virtualization-on-intel-macs#comment-1628</guid>
		<description>I have a quick MAC question.  Have you used Apeture?  Heard anything about it?  Some of my photographer friends are not impressed, but I see some things that sound good.  I like the design control of the books too.  Any input?  

LORI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a quick MAC question.  Have you used Apeture?  Heard anything about it?  Some of my photographer friends are not impressed, but I see some things that sound good.  I like the design control of the books too.  Any input?  </p>
<p>LORI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/13 queries in 0.008 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 618/618 objects using memcached

Served from: blurbomat.com @ 2012-05-23 07:27:28 -->
