Camera FAQ

070123_5d.jpgI wanted this to be an in-depth post about the Canon 5D and why we chose it over other cameras, specifically how that relates to our existing Nikon D70s. Also, how it relates to the Canon/Nikon “war”. Apparently, a “war” that is similar to the PC/Mac “war”.

Instead of dealing with those large issues, as I don’t really have a platform preference for cameras (I love Holgas, for example, does that mean the Diana or other toy cameras need defending or shouting down??), I’m going to just give you the gear rundown and a brief note about why we chose the 5D. We still use and love the Nikon D70s. But we fight over the 5D. Which is why I did a morning walkabout in Manhattan while Heather was doing her thing on our New York trip last month.

Points

First, we wanted to buy a second camera, largely to reduce the back and forth when we travel together and shoot. “Did you take this one? Did I?”

Second, I wanted to take a step up. We looked at the Nikon options and the Canon options. For us, the Canon options looked more attractive from a price/specs vantage point, very similar to where we were in 2004 with the Nikon purchase. I think I’m more drawn to the Canon lens options. Save your arguments about awesome Nikon glass for a photography forum or a digg post. It’s not so much about the quality of lenses as it is options with price/features. I think Canon and Nikon make great lenses. As do a number of manufacturers. The Canon line appeals to me a bit more. Faster speeds and a wider selection. Will I use all of that range? Dunno. But when looking for lenses for the D70, I decided to wait, as it seemed that Nikon was in the middle of a lens lineup refresh.

When we were in Austin last spring, I shot with a Canon 24-70 2.8L USM and its buttery goodness forced me to make a mental note. A couple of hours later, I was able to take a few shots with a 5D and the game was nearly over at that point. So a Canon would be our second camera. And then we replaced our sewer. And got sued. I took on more freelance work. And then Santa Claus came.

Third, to get a full-frame sensor in a digital SLR meant that there were only a few options. The 5D was not only the cheapest, but really the only one in the Canon line for us. There was only one other full-frame, high megapixel camera: the 1DS Mark II. It is more than double the price. It’s a fantastic camera, but for us, too rich.

Fourth, we purchased the following gear (with rebates!) from Canon:
–5D body
–24-70mm 2.8L USM lens
–50mm 1.4 USM lens
–Canon Speedlite 430EX flash
–extra battery
–B+W UV filter
–Lowepro Stealth Reporter D300 AW (It’s too small)
–I can’t decide if I want a super wide angle or a 70-200mm next, but we’ll likely rent a few lenses to figure out our next purchase, sometime in 2015.

Fifth, Canon is not paying for anything in this post.

Sixth, I’ve gotten a flood of email and a few comments about what we use to handle the RAW files. On our tower, which is Heather’s machine, we have Adobe Creative Suite 2, using Bridge and the Camera Raw plugin into Photoshop. I use Adobe Photoshop Lightroom (a free beta app) on my laptop, and I’ll pop into Photoshop CS when I need to make a quick edit. I’ve heard good things about other apps, but it really depends on how you work and what you are looking for. Right now, this is our setup, but it will likely change.

Seventh, storage. We’ve gradually purchased larger and larger Compact Flash cards from Costco. We have three 2gb cards and two 1gb cards. For the computers, I’m looking at external drives, and we’ll probably settle on a Western Digital or Seagate. The Western Digital 500gb RAID 1/1Terabyte RAID 0 with dual FireWire 800 ports is looking pretty sweet, if a little more expensive than the Seagate options. I’d like to be able to move it around from computer to computer for backup purposes, so an external drive is looking like the way we’ll go.

Eighth, getting pro-level gear (I think the 5D is on the high end of the prosumer designation) is part of the process, as is working to take better pictures. The extra megapixels and improved sensor mean that we have more information to work with when doing things like Chuck’s calendar or other stuff we’d like to share. More on that soon.

Conclusion

Finally, we hope to get better as photographers and share our work with you, because you are a big part of the reason we can do this. So thanks again and if you have further questions, post them in the comments.

  • http://theblablab.com doug

    Ah yes – the envy. It really hit home for me how nice the 1.4 lens could be with the shot Heather took of me on the bus, knowing what the lighting conditions were. That alone made me start looking/shopping for another dSLR (almost certainly a D80).

    As an aside, as nice as LowePro bages are, I am a total Crumpler convert, for any kind of bag they make. I have two of their laptop bags, two small cases for cameras/iPods, and have seen some of their photography bags. Fantastic stuff, and some great deals to be had on you-know-where. I got both my laptop bags new for less than half of ‘retail’. Unfortunately, their site(s) are annoying as hell.

  • http://albatrosswoman.livejournal.com AlbatrossWoman

    Long time reader, first comment. The photos that you and Dooce put up inspired my husband and I to get our first SLR camera; we love the shots you take and especially love that you share your technical know-how. We have the Digital Rebel XT, and I was wondering if you (or your readers) could share some advice about getting different lenses. There are a lot and we’re not sure where to start. Your camera makes me drool, by the way.

  • http://soubriquet.net dotsara

    Great summary; food for thought.

    I just spent 2 weeks with a 70-200mm f/2.8 and it was glorious. Heavy as all get-out, but incredible. I adore my 12-24, but that 70-200 is a dream.

    And congrats on your spot in JPG’s new issue. (:

  • rbg

    as far as bags go, i’ve tried a lot of different ones. but i’m pretty happy with my burton zoom bag. it’s fits my cameras and lenses nicely, but is made with a “sportier” feel.

    lame word, i know. but still a great bag.

  • http://www.missleonie.com Leonie

    Any chance we’ll see “Blurbodoocery – THE Guide to Taking Photos That Make Other People Cry a Bit” this year?

    My poor little DMC-FZ7 (bless its socks – I’m a student, it’s all I could afford, but it’s pretty good for the number of dollars I had to hand over) will of course never mimic any of your photos, but a masterclass about Blurbodoocery photography? I’d pay more attention than I have throughout uni so far.

    Pretty please?

  • wynk

    Thanks for this, we’ve been looking at the 5D for a while but don’t know anyone else that’s had one to ask how they liked it. We currently use the Canon Digital Rebel (the original model) and have been happy with it, but would like something a little more serious to add to the collection.

    One thing I’ve been wanting to find out that has little to do with this specific camera, is how much post-processing you do to your pictures as far as color and contrast go–the pictures are always quite sharp and yet there’s something about the color that is just this side of other-worldly. I love the look and I’d like to know what in the world you are doing to achieve this.

    Contrast, for example, the pictures Heather posted of Annie’s kids, with this, probably one of my better shots for color/depth, using the Speedlite flash:

    http://farm1.static.flickr.com/163/337041196_365a73f170.jpg?v=0

    See the difference? Teach me.

  • http://www.agirlandaboy.com leahkay

    Jon, I’m wondering if you could tell me a little bit about what makes the 50/1.4 so great. I’ve had a 17-85mm on my Rebel Xt for the last year and a half and have been trying to decide between going a little bit wider or a lot “zoomier” for my next lens, but then everyone started going bonkers over the 50mm (I blame you), and I just can’t figure out what the big deal is. I think my problem is that I depend on Photoshop to do most of the work for me, e.g., instead of a zoom lens, take large files and crop them closer, or if the lighting is bad, fool with levels on screen. Not the most professional approach, but then I’m not a professional photographer, so I feel like I can get away with it. Anyway, if you could enlighten me as to the magic of the 50mm, I would love to hear it.

  • southerngirl

    I’ve always been impressed with Canon cameras since my first Canon SLR.

    I found this Mac toy while perusing Apple’s web site and I am enamored with it. Thought you, Heather, and Leta would enjoy it, too

    http://tinyurl.com/9t5l6

    Disclaimer: I am in no way associated with this software. I am just easily amused.

  • http://www.dawnm.com/fresh/ Dawn M

    Congrats and welcome to the other side!

  • http://www.eighthourlunch.com Eight Hour Lunch

    As you know, I’ve shot with the Canon 5D. I loved it so much that I’m seriously thinking about pushing my old Nikon down the stairs. ;)

    Of course that’ll have to wait until I land a few more freelance jobs and can justify the expense.

    Anyhow, I like a ton of your 5D work so far. Keep up the great work.

  • http://www.christineplamann.com/dev/ chris plamann

    leahkay, i’m a huge fan of the 50mm lens. there are three versions [1.8, 1.4 and 1.2L] and i have all three! in general, prime lenses are quite a bit sharper than non-L zoomy lenses. also, the 50mm lenses are SUPER fast to focus and open up wide enough to accomodate low light situations. they’re fantastic for portraits.

    as far as bags go, i love my crumpler “million dollar home” bags. i have the 7 for work (two bodies, two lenses, flash and a meter) and a 5 for walking around.

  • http://www.christineplamann.com/dev/ chris plamann

    also, if you’re looking for a great lens rental place, i’ve had fabulous experiences with paul at lensprotogo.com

  • anneelizmary

    I’m a complete newbie, a late adopter with my first digital Olympus FE-190, 6 megapixels worth of point and shoot, but I, too, appreciate your helpful review and your efforts, which continually wow me. When one has subjects like Leta and Chuck (not to mention NYC and Amsterdam), it’s a worthy endeavor.

  • http://aredeaf.blogspot.com Coelecanth

    I’m beginning to think there’s something wrong with me. There was no earthly reason for me to read all of these comments and yet I did. I own a Pentax K-1000 fully manual 35mm and just one lens. The lens talk I get but “Western Digital 500gb RAID 1/1Terabyte RAID 0″ and the rest of it might as well be in Martian. I guess it’s the geek equivalent of hearing a mass in Latin, good for the soul despite the lack of comprehension. :)

  • http://www.redhotmamma.blogspot.com rhm

    Thanks for sharing this! I’m just starting to get into photography & I really admire yours and Heather’s work. I check out the daily photo, well, daily on dooce.

  • http://www.christineplamann.com/dev/ chris plamann

    one last thing, and then i will stop monopolizing these comments, but another major major major benefit to the 5D is the almost complete lack of noise at high ISOs. with the 20D and 30D, the noise was just awful above 800. now i can easily shoot at 1600 and 3200 and the noise isn’t obnoxious at all!

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/brikwall Brikwall

    I use the RebelXT with the EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM and the 70-200mm f/2.8L USM (non-IS). They are both incredible lenses, perhaps too good for my own abilities. I also have the 50mm f/1.8 but don’t use it very much.

    I would love to have a 5D. However, it is more camera than this amateur hack needs at the moment. Besides, I’d rather invest in good glass that should serve me well for many years to come than camera bodies that become obsolete in a year or so (but I’d still love to have a 5D).

  • http://www.radicalangles.com Wes Allen

    Hey, nice choice! After having an XT, the a 20d(still have), I got a 5D a few weeks ago, and it is very nice. Regarding your next lens, you might thing about the 15 mm f/2.8 Fisheye – it really shines on a Full Frame. I have the 70-200 2.8 as well, and it also is super nice.

    And for RAW, I have aperture to be outstanding, to the point of almost not needing PS anymore.

  • http://misspriss.org becky

    I’ve been wondering what camera you went with. Thanks for giving the details. I still love my D70 and was originally impressed by the quality of your and Heather’s shots.

    John, what type of processing does Lightroom do? I went to the site, but all I could find was a 20 min tutorial which I didn’t have time to watch. I wish they would just list what does (if they do, I didn’t find it).

    Liking the photos. Keep ‘em coming! :)

  • http://misspriss.org becky

    crap. Sorry for the misspelling. My husband’s name is John, so I automatically typed it that way.

    My apologies, Jon.

  • http://www.bonnieberryphotography.com/ JLobster

    My wife is a semi-professional photographer (pimp link above) and LOVES her 5D. She also mainly got it for the full-frame sensor. It takes awesome pictures, much better than her previous prosumer Pentax *ist D.

    As for storage, go for a NAS. My preference is the Infrant ReadyNAS line. About the size of one of the Mac G4 Cubes, it can hold up to 4 SATA drives that you can buy off the shelf (not EVERY drive, but most of them). You can start with one and add. It will just autoexpand the RAID (first mirroring with 2 drives, then progressively larger RAID 5). You can even replace the drives one by one with larger drives and it will autoexpand once all of them have been replaced! The RAID 5 should give you the basic protection you need, plus it will take a snapshot on a regular basis (you decide) that will allow you to see what that volume looked like when that snapshot was taken. Accidentally deleted a folder? Go back to last night’s snapshot!

    Also, it has Gb LAN, jumbo frame support, and supports both Windows and Mac very well. It even has a USB port that you can hook a card reader up to and when you pop a card into it, it will auto download it into a dated folder.

    I can not recommend the Infrant ReadyNAS enough. We use it and would not go back.

  • http://www.blurbomat.com blurb

    JLobster, thanks for that recommendation! I bought a cheapy Western Digital My Book 500 Gb drive from Costco for $219 a couple of days ago to test it as a backup drive. I think for photo storage, we’ll look at a RAID solution. Do you have any good retailers to purchase the Infrant ReadyNAS from?

  • http://www.bonnieberryphotography.com/ JLobster

    I don’t have a preferred vendor, as they sell through the regular internet outlets like New Egg, etc. I ended up buying the version with no disks ($650 if I remember correctly) and eBayed some Seagate 500GB drives. Eventually we needed to expand from 2 to 3 drives and I bought an entirely different Seagate HD. The upgrade was seamless.

    If you are looking to save a bit of money, you may be able to get a discount on the ReadyNAS NV (instead of the NV+). The only real difference is that there is a neat LCD display on the NV+, and it also comes included with Retrospect backup software. I have the NV plain and don’t miss either.

    Just make sure to check their hardware compatibility guide in their wiki before you buy: http://www.infrant.com/wiki/index.php/Hardware_Compatibility_List

  • http://flickr.com/photos/coyote/sets Coyote

    I have the 30D, the 430EX and seven lenses, 5 of which are Canons. I highly recommend the new-ish Canon 70-300 IS. (Don’t confuse it with the older DO version or either of the 75-300 lenses.) It has better range than a 70-200 and its image quality continues to surprise me, as does the ability to capture useable images at 1/15 of a second. It’s also smaller and lighter than my 70-200 f/4L, which is definitely a bonus. Reasonably priced, as well.

    For a wide angle lens, I’ve been very pleased with the image quality of the Tamron 17-35. It’s also quite reasonably priced.

    If you’re not already familiar with the reviews section at the FredMiranda.com, check it out. I chose all my lenses based on the reviews at that site because they’re extremely fussy. I never bought a lens unless the FM site rated it a minimum of 8.5 out of 10. And I absolutely love all of them.

  • http://wendymacblogs.blogspot.com Wendy Mac

    OK, I have a question.

    I’ve been using my little point and shoot digital for a year now. I’m ready to step up to a beginner’s level Digital SLR. What do you recommend for a beginner?

    Thanks :-)

    You can e-mail me at sandiegopadresmom at gmail dot com.

    (Umm, this question is for Jon and for anyone else who has a recommendation! Thanks!)