Palin Resignation: Links Galore

Several of you have written or commented asking me my thoughts about Governor Sarah Palin’s sudden resignation. I’ve been keeping a links notepad, hoping to find time to publish it. As you might imagine, we’re a little pre-occupied over here and a lot tired as well.

My thoughts, which should surprise no one: Palin was a horrible pick for McCain. The only thing that saved McCain’s career was that he didn’t resign from the Senate. Ultimately, the need for McCain to pander to the extreme views of the GOP core contributed to his disastrous VP pick and as time passed in the campaign, it was obvious that McCain’s decision-making abilities were called into question by independent voters.

Palin, kept her Alaska job as a fallback, but rather than finish the job she was elected for, decided to quit. Palin wasn’t (and isn’t) fit for national office, screamingly obvious in even the softest of interviews during the 2008 election as well as in the interviews following her surprise resignation.

The very core of the conservative base, the most fringy, the most extreme absolutely love Palin and apparently can look past things like coherent sentence construction and ability to function off-script. I’m glad she resigned. Nothing would please me more than seeing her vie for the White House in 2012. I thnk Palin is taking Obama’s Audacity of Hope to heart. I just wonder if conservatives can look past her bailing on her government job.

* * *

We begin the link cavalcade with the piece in Vanity Fair that may have caused the resignation. It’s not pretty.

This piece from Slate points out her incoherence and how her frustrations are weirdly inverted. Choice bit:

“Once you understand that Palin’s only actual message is the importance of loving and understanding Palin, it becomes easier to understand why she quit.”

Conservatives spinning it on Fox News:

“From a messaging standpoint Palin is perfect. She is also the only one who can reasonably argue that she hasn’t been part of either the Republican or Democratic web of Washington politics. No bailouts, big spending, or Buenos Aires lust romps.”

Pitch perfect? If no ability to form a sentence that says anything remotely resembling clear, lucid, coherent thought is perfection then I want what Fox News is smoking. Quitting mid-term is good? Quitting is a family value? Not governing = good?

People who live in real political life like Virginia gubernatorial candidate Bob McDonnell aren’t too sure about Palin’s motives:

“But McDonnell also predicted the contest would not be affected by any high-profile endorsements on either side and professed confusion about Palin’s abrupt decision to leave office with 18 months left in her term.”

“‘I don’t know how this recent announcement — which I still don’t fully understand; I only know what I’ve read in the media — how that fully plays out and whether she’s going to prefer a private life or whether she still wants to stay actively involved,’ McDonnell said.”

Watch this video:

from this story at LATimes.com.

This cutting gem from a blog at the Washington Post:

“Sarah Palin should live up to her self-proclaimed Christian ‘family values’ and do what she says is the moral thing to do: put her family first and help those who cannot help themselves.”

This column from the Chicago Tribune about Palin’s staying power and compares Palin & Harriet Meiers (the failed Supreme Court nominee before Alito was nominated). This column plays the babe card.

Disputing the “millions of dollars spent” line from her resignation:
Is this piece:

“A large part of the Palin administration’s $1.9 million cost breakdown is $560,800 for state personnel board work on ethics complaints. But the board itself recently gave a much smaller figure — $300,000 — for hiring outside investigators for the complaints, nearly all of which have been dismissed. Perez said the difference is the larger number represents contracts for services not yet billed.

“Around two-thirds of the $300,000 that has been spent was in addressing the ‘Troopergate’ issue last fall. Palin herself initiated the personnel board investigation on ‘Troopergate,’ saying that the state Legislature’s investigation of the matter was politicized and she was seeking the appropriate venue to deal with it. The Palin administration cost breakdown also includes what’s calculated as more than $100,000 worth of per-hour state lawyer time related to the Legislature’s investigation of the ‘Troopergate’ affair. The Legislature’s report found Palin abused her power, while the personnel board’s investigator disagreed.”

A long way from non-elite hockey mom to the conservative elite in Washington DC.

I think I agree most with this straightforward piece from boston.com:

“Palin was unprepared for the national spotlight, and quickly looked unqualified.”

Conservatives can whine all they want that Palin has been “mistreated” in the media. It’s not mistreatment if you can’t explain yourself or answer simple questions about your statements. The problem is that when you deal with a narcissist, they see themselves as above everybody else; narcissists only care what you think about them. As it’s clearly been seen, the media has a love/hate thing going with Palin. She likely puts butts in the seats, but when she opens her mouth, nothing of substance ever comes out. Palin is the perfect illustration of what’s wrong with the GOP. All PR and image, no ideas. By all means, nominate her for president. If she can’t handle being a governor of a lesser state, there’s no way she can handle being commander-in-chief.

Finally this bit of snark from Maureen Dowd. Rawr.

How long until we hear about her Fox News talk show?

  • http://beckycochrane.livejournal.com Becky

    Conservative Peggy Noonan is just as critical: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124716984620819351.html

    • http://blurbomat.com blurb

      Fantastic! Thanks for sharing this.

  • http://emailtoid.net/i/c39fe447/6591f071/ emailtoid.net/i/c39fe447/…

    Palin just quit her CNN show so she’s paving the way for a platform on Fox. And she’sway too much of a loose cannon to go the two-party route. Look for a few years of high-profile public life in which she bashes both Dems and GOPs and then makes a third-party run.

  • nobody

    She has embarrassed everyone who spoke for her last fall.

    I still don’t think her candidacy gave a fair test of her abilities — most national candidates have far more time and space to prepare themselves. I don’t think she was well served by the advice she got, and I don’t think the media were fair. I think she’s become a target for inspection and ridicule precisely because she has potential.

    But she has seemed more interested in exploiting her new opportunities than her job, or in preparing herself for larger leadership. She could have reduced her profile by disavowing a 2012 run, staying put in Alaska until June, and eschewing devices like her PAC. She could have done the homework she didn’t have time for in 2008, and participated in a badly needed discussion of the GOP’s foundations going forward. She could have given real thought to what she could contribute to our exhausted politics. Instead she’s sought to maintain her national profile while disavowing any ambition, while blaming her troubles on a succession of cliches.

    More than anything, she seems deeply confused by a taste for the spotlight and a simplistic analysis of American politics. She’s making herself into exactly the caricature her critics have drawn. She would have done far better to consult the history of Reagan, Nixon, Johnson, Bush Sr. — national politics favors those who can play the long game.

  • mzpeach

    Thank you SO much for this. Like you, I hope the Repubs are stupid and dysfunctional enough to encourage her to run in 2012. What more could our President hope for? Hell yah, she should run. Watching her go down in flames will be so much fun! Whatever gives David Letterman great material works for me.

  • Nat W.

    Yes, but how does the former Congressman feel about these developments? Dying to know what Chuck has to say.

  • krgosselin

    I think you’ve covered everything I hate about Palin, in one handy reference. Thank you!

    BUT I still don’t get what Peggy Noonan and the commenter “nobody” said here about the media taking it too far. Seriously? I thought they were too kind. She got a patient Katie Couric repeating questions when any other VP candidate would have been laughed out of the room. And attacks on her children? The daughter of a stanch abstinence-only sex education candidate got pregnant as a teenager. The media would be out of their MINDS to point out the hypocrisy there. And I have yet to see where Palin’s allegations (in her resignation speech) of people “making fun of Trig” are coming from. Trust me, I’d be right there with the indignation over that…but I don’t think it happened. And no, Letterman doesn’t count. Despicable, but not a news source.

    Strangely enough, I hope that the far-right morons run Palin in 2012, so that the Republican Party can split, like it desperately needs to. I know more frustrated and alienated Republicans than I can count right now. They aren’t liberal enough to be Democrats (even I have those days!), but the far-right wackery is making them as disgusted as you or I. There are actually some solid Republicans out there, and as much as I love a Democratic President AND Congress (yay Franken!), we need opposing views to have balance. Ahem, LEGITIMATE and WELL-SUPPORTED opposing views.

    Phew, done, I swear.

  • krgosselin

    Not done. I just had to respond to “nobody”‘s comment that “I still don’t think her candidacy gave a fair test of her abilities — most national candidates have far more time and space to prepare themselves.”

    No, no, no, and…no. Most national candidates have experience. And knowledge. They don’t NEED that time and space to prepare, and she shouldn’t have either. Had McCain chosen any of his other front-runners, they would NOT have needed that time and space to prepare. Would they have needed time to brush up? Sure. Would they flub their way through every interview after weeks of preparation and a two-week media blackout? Not a chance…Dan Quayle being the obvious exception.

    No time to prepare is NOT an acceptable excuse when the stakes are this high.

    • nobody

      At the moment of her nomination she had as much time as a Governor as Obama had in the Senate. His resume was so light pundits were claiming his organization of his campaign counted as experience.

      National candidates generally have two years to be briefed by experts, build a team, test and hone ideas, practice debating in lower stakes venues. It’s all time well spent. We don’t know how Palin would have done in the summer of 2008 if she had a similar tune-up.

      She tried to appear as comprehensively knowledgeable as those types, and far more qualified on foreign policy than she was. She should have prepared heavily on a half dozen issues and hit those hard, avoided detail everything else, and admitted the obvious fact that she had a lot to learn.

      I think she’s been vain, arrogant, and quite simplistic in her politics. Maybe she’ll outgrow them, though she doesn’t seem interested in that. In any case, these are bad qualities and we’re better off having seen them early. But I’m not sure whether other politicians have less of these flaws, or have learned to better hide them.

      • krgosselin

        Sorry, I should have been more specific. I was specifically referring to Vice Presidential candidates. Presidential candidates know what they plan on doing long in advance, so they obviously have time to prepare. VP candidates, although they may have suspected and hoped that they’d have time to prepare, cannot predict it. I cannot think of another VP candidate aside from maybe Quayle who did as terribly in every interview, debate, appearance, etc. as Palin did.

        On the Obama topic – although he did not have a great deal of experience in government, he had a background of knowledge that you cannot begin to argue that Palin had. He majored in PoliSci, with a focus on international relations. He went to law school and focused on constitutional law. Palin majored in communications and I think it’s pretty clear that she doesn’t have a grasp of that, much less law and policy (she didn’t know what the VP did! I don’t blame that on a verbal flub…). Heck, I didn’t even major in PoliSci and I only follow politics as a sometimes-hobby, but I feel I could have fielded questions in the Couric interview better than Palin did. And I can’t even see Russia from my house… ;)

        I have to agree with you entirely on the vain/arrogant thing. The stuff that came out post-campaign was incredible, but not surprising to me. Her refusing to take criticism, refusing help in preparing, etc. etc. etc. She is close-minded and absolutely opposed to seeing anything that doesn’t fit her tiny and precarious worldview. That’s terrifying in anyone with any type of power. Horrifying.

        • nobody

          Since 1996, the VP candidates have been: Kemp, Gore, Cheney, Lieberman, Edwards, Palin, Biden. All save Cheney, and maybe Lieberman, were formerly Presidential candidates.

          • krgosselin

            Then maybe that says something about the field from which Presidential candidates choose their VP’s…maybe getting someone who actually has taken that time to prepare isn’t such a bad thing. Additionally, it’s important to mention again that Palin did not take the mountain of assistance and preparation that was offered to her. She had some big-name people on her side and she didn’t take help where help was needed.

        • nobody

          Oh, and also, re this:

          ” I feel I could have fielded questions in the Couric interview better than Palin did.”

          I think you have more in common with the Governor than you might like to admit.

          • krgosselin

            I mean, I have a vagina. And brownish hair. And I also wear glasses. But I’m pretty sure it stops there.

            Also stopping here: my desire to find common ground with you. That really wasn’t a necessary statement for you to make, and I don’t appreciate it.

  • Joanne

    oh no, jon. i didn’t think you would, but you went ahead and did. you wrote about the hollow persona that is sarah palin instead of focusing on more relevant issues such as health care! you are the pbs of the blogosphere, the amy goodman of relevant information, the dennis kucinich of truth and justice! and now you’ve gone mainstream with this post! what the heck? (i say with a smile, half jesting).

    the repubs are experiencing a steady decline, morally, ethically, and politically, it’s true. but we will experience the same thing if we continue to get pulled into this finger pointing game and lose focus.

    and while i understand an argument can be made for sarah palin being a culturally relevant phenomenon, to me it’s clear that reporting on it constantly comes at a pretty big expense, don’t you think?

    if we insist on playing though, let’s talk about sonia sotomayor. beautiful, smart, educated, experienced, and dignified. the new sexy.

    in the meantime, is it rude to post this non-palin link to bill moyer’s interview with wendell potter regarding health care?? http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/07102009/watch2.html/watch?v=Mv1FwOCNoZ8

  • http://simplyblissful.blogspot.com/ tracy

    Woo hoo! The Blurb “Palin” post! I was looking forward to this as much as your wife’s labor post & I saw hers first. And since it’s now 2am and I would be asleep if weren’t for all that damn caffeine, I’m off to bed & can’t wait to read your post tomorrow. I assume you caught tonight’s (Monday) Jon Stewart? Lordy, can he give it to Sarah good! No one can hate on Palin better than Jon Stewart.

  • http://shaunna.typepad.com shaunna

    she’s already slated to make an appearance in this county next month at a tra-la gop shindig:

    http://www.venturacountystar.com/news/2009/jul/13/palin-expected-at-simi-gop-gala-group-says/

    i suppose what else do you expect at the reagan library, although it does make me seriously question the decision to return here from a stint in nor cal… weather (the.best.ever) or not. ocean or not.

    whatever.