<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who’s Gonna Buy That?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blurbomat.com/2010/01/29/whos-gonna-buy-that/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blurbomat.com/2010/01/29/whos-gonna-buy-that/</link>
	<description>Jon Armstrong shares photos, music, politics, hair &#38; pants.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 07:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leask</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2010/01/29/whos-gonna-buy-that/comment-page-1/#comment-33019</link>
		<dc:creator>Leask</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/?p=3541#comment-33019</guid>
		<description>I definitely see the appeal of the iPad, though I don&#039;t see myself buying one in the near future, if only because in the last month I bought a Kindle and 13&quot; MacBook Pro, and already own an iPhone.  Between these three, I have my bases generally covered.

However, like I said, I can definitely see the market for the device, even if it doesn&#039;t include me.  Jon, I wholeheartedly agree with your statement about the short-sightedness of projecting one&#039;s desires onto a device or other people; I&#039;d call it the cardinal sin of nerds, geeks, and the internet in general.  The internet and the world would both be nicer places if more people didn&#039;t conflate &quot;I don&#039;t want one&quot; with &quot;It shouldn&#039;t exist, and anybody who wants it is stupid&quot;.

One thing I&#039;m looking forward to seeing is to what extent people&#039;s opinions change once the device itself hits the streets and they can see it and use it without buying one or going to the store.  I&#039;m not generally an early adopter, so I can&#039;t speak to this effect on many devices, but the Kindle 2 only became available in Canada towards the end of 2009 and is still fairly rare to see, and it&#039;s interesting to see people&#039;s responses before and after they see or use one.  I got a lot of rolled eyes and amused expressions from older family and coworkers when I talked about buying an e-reader, but after seeing it in person they&#039;ve all been impressed with it.  Not necessarily impressed enough to go out and buy one right now, but it got rid of a lot of prejudices and nudged them closer to considering one down the line.  I&#039;ve even had a few people see the Kindle from across the room and be so fascinated that they came over and asked about it.  When they found out what it was, they&#039;ve often confessed that what they&#039;d imagined a Kindle or e-reader as was something completely different.  

I think, in the end, it&#039;s instances like these that form more lasting opinions of gadgets and devices than knee-jerk internet reactions from strangers, which are quicker and more numerous at first, but ultimately carry less weight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely see the appeal of the iPad, though I don’t see myself buying one in the near future, if only because in the last month I bought a Kindle and 13″ MacBook Pro, and already own an iPhone.  Between these three, I have my bases generally covered.</p>
<p>However, like I said, I can definitely see the market for the device, even if it doesn’t include me.  Jon, I wholeheartedly agree with your statement about the short-sightedness of projecting one’s desires onto a device or other people; I’d call it the cardinal sin of nerds, geeks, and the internet in general.  The internet and the world would both be nicer places if more people didn’t conflate “I don’t want one” with “It shouldn’t exist, and anybody who wants it is stupid”.</p>
<p>One thing I’m looking forward to seeing is to what extent people’s opinions change once the device itself hits the streets and they can see it and use it without buying one or going to the store.  I’m not generally an early adopter, so I can’t speak to this effect on many devices, but the Kindle 2 only became available in Canada towards the end of 2009 and is still fairly rare to see, and it’s interesting to see people’s responses before and after they see or use one.  I got a lot of rolled eyes and amused expressions from older family and coworkers when I talked about buying an e-reader, but after seeing it in person they’ve all been impressed with it.  Not necessarily impressed enough to go out and buy one right now, but it got rid of a lot of prejudices and nudged them closer to considering one down the line.  I’ve even had a few people see the Kindle from across the room and be so fascinated that they came over and asked about it.  When they found out what it was, they’ve often confessed that what they’d imagined a Kindle or e-reader as was something completely different.  </p>
<p>I think, in the end, it’s instances like these that form more lasting opinions of gadgets and devices than knee-jerk internet reactions from strangers, which are quicker and more numerous at first, but ultimately carry less weight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blurb</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2010/01/29/whos-gonna-buy-that/comment-page-1/#comment-33018</link>
		<dc:creator>blurb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/?p=3541#comment-33018</guid>
		<description>You have missed the point entirely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have missed the point entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yolanda</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2010/01/29/whos-gonna-buy-that/comment-page-1/#comment-33017</link>
		<dc:creator>Yolanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/?p=3541#comment-33017</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a mom and a self-labeled geek and I absolutely want an iPad. I don&#039;t have a smart phone. I don&#039;t have a Kindle. And I *still* use an iPod Mini, not because I&#039;m technological luddite, but because my budget is tight and  I rarely replace a working device with another, simply because the next-great-thing has come out. Sure, I blog, edit photos in Lightroom, and do a lot of hardcore Photoshop play. But that is actually a small portion of how I spend my computer time. Most of that time is spent instant messaging, checking Facebook, surfing endless websites and blogs. 

The iPad is the computer I can imagine taking with me everywhere. For some people, their iTouch/iPhone already does that for them. I have a Macbook, and occasionally I have to take it with me, but it&#039;s far from a take-everywhere device. I also like to end each night flipping through a magazine, catalog, or reading a book--in bed. Occasionally I surf the net all the way to sleep. The possibility of having a small, light machine that could meet all these needs is very appealing to me. 

Why wouldn&#039;t I lust for an iPhone instead? Because it&#039;s small and I have astigmatism and carpal tunnel. I have a diaper bag or giant purse with me at all times, anyway. So, pocket portability is a non-issue for me. I think there are a lot of people, an yes a lot of women, students, moms, and grandparents who will find this device as appealing as I do. I also think there are a lot of mouthy geeks out there who are going to talk their less-geeky parents and friends out of buying the device simply because geeks don&#039;t get why some users don&#039;t need their machines to do everything at once and as fast as possible. 

But what do I know? I do all my television viewing on an AppleTV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m a mom and a self-labeled geek and I absolutely want an iPad. I don’t have a smart phone. I don’t have a Kindle. And I *still* use an iPod Mini, not because I’m technological luddite, but because my budget is tight and  I rarely replace a working device with another, simply because the next-great-thing has come out. Sure, I blog, edit photos in Lightroom, and do a lot of hardcore Photoshop play. But that is actually a small portion of how I spend my computer time. Most of that time is spent instant messaging, checking Facebook, surfing endless websites and blogs. </p>
<p>The iPad is the computer I can imagine taking with me everywhere. For some people, their iTouch/iPhone already does that for them. I have a Macbook, and occasionally I have to take it with me, but it’s far from a take-everywhere device. I also like to end each night flipping through a magazine, catalog, or reading a book–in bed. Occasionally I surf the net all the way to sleep. The possibility of having a small, light machine that could meet all these needs is very appealing to me. </p>
<p>Why wouldn’t I lust for an iPhone instead? Because it’s small and I have astigmatism and carpal tunnel. I have a diaper bag or giant purse with me at all times, anyway. So, pocket portability is a non-issue for me. I think there are a lot of people, an yes a lot of women, students, moms, and grandparents who will find this device as appealing as I do. I also think there are a lot of mouthy geeks out there who are going to talk their less-geeky parents and friends out of buying the device simply because geeks don’t get why some users don’t need their machines to do everything at once and as fast as possible. </p>
<p>But what do I know? I do all my television viewing on an AppleTV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UptownMike</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2010/01/29/whos-gonna-buy-that/comment-page-1/#comment-33016</link>
		<dc:creator>UptownMike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/?p=3541#comment-33016</guid>
		<description>I agree that $499 is a great price for the version being release right now.  But aren&#039;t the folks that buy it going to feel like fools once Apple releases the 3G version down the road in April?  I really don&#039;t understand the motive for releasing a version that&#039;s inferior to its immediate successor, other than greed.  Why not give the consumer the best version right off the bat?

Also, it&#039;s just hard to forgive them for double dipping their loyal iPhone customers by charging a second data fee.  That just chaffs.  At least for me.  Maybe that&#039;s AT&amp;Ts fault.  Granted, a lot of folks might just run it off their home wi-fi. In which case, the iPad actually looses a step to the Kindle which comes with free 3G right out of the box.  Also, if you don&#039;t spring for the data plan, then you&#039;re basically carrying around a huge iPod touch combined with a low-grade laptop without a network card.  

Of coure, I&#039;m arguing need, you&#039;re talking about desire, in which case I totally agree with you.  I just don&#039;t see this as a smart purchase, but that&#039;s not how America works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that $499 is a great price for the version being release right now.  But aren’t the folks that buy it going to feel like fools once Apple releases the 3G version down the road in April?  I really don’t understand the motive for releasing a version that’s inferior to its immediate successor, other than greed.  Why not give the consumer the best version right off the bat?</p>
<p>Also, it’s just hard to forgive them for double dipping their loyal iPhone customers by charging a second data fee.  That just chaffs.  At least for me.  Maybe that’s AT&amp;Ts fault.  Granted, a lot of folks might just run it off their home wi-fi. In which case, the iPad actually looses a step to the Kindle which comes with free 3G right out of the box.  Also, if you don’t spring for the data plan, then you’re basically carrying around a huge iPod touch combined with a low-grade laptop without a network card.  </p>
<p>Of coure, I’m arguing need, you’re talking about desire, in which case I totally agree with you.  I just don’t see this as a smart purchase, but that’s not how America works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robdiz</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2010/01/29/whos-gonna-buy-that/comment-page-1/#comment-33015</link>
		<dc:creator>Robdiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/?p=3541#comment-33015</guid>
		<description>Are you people out of your minds? I could write books to respond to all of these posts, but I&#039;ll stick to the original.
1.&quot;For $10 more for an iPad I get:
-8x the storage
-a color screen
-a touch screen
-a touch OS
-a better web browser
-a better media player (iTunes)
-works on my home/work/plane wifi network
-the ability to download apps that do other things like play Scrabble and do Crosswords&quot;
I don&#039;t know if you&#039;ve lived under a rock for the past couple of years, but the Ipod Touch does all this...for just a few bucks under $500.



2.&quot;Still think it’s a shitty device? That Apple didn’t “try hard enough”? You aren’t the target. Reader buyers are. &quot; You do realize that if it were intended to be FOR readers, that the reading applications would be the number one topic discussed when the device was released? Yes it will be one of the best reading devices out there, but because it is coming from apple, and because it has all the other capabilities that make it more than just a reader, it can&#039;t just be good at one minor thing. It has made 0 improvements from the latest item released, the IPhone/ITouch besides being bigger. 

3.&quot;The final piece of this for me is that $499 is a killer price for something that could replace a laptop for the most casual of users. In this category I include people who surf and do email, with some light productivity needs&quot;
Replace a laptop!? You have got to be joking. Lets go over a quick list of what my shitty 5 year old laptop collecting dust on my shelf can do that the Ipad cannot (lets not get into new devices, cause that wouldn&#039;t be fair...). 1-USB, nuff said. 2-alternate resolutions for the so called &quot;amazing movie viewing experience, in 4:3&quot;. 3-FLASH, how can you leave that out of any browsing device in today&#039;s age? 4-Video camera. 5-Ability to install any software that apple has made AND any other companies! God forbid I dare ask for software that the app store cannot provide me. How dare I. 6-A real keyboard. Ok the touch keyboard is sweet, but it will not be fun on those wrists using it at the awakward angles. There is an attachment for a full keyboard, but why buy something that any computer should come with? 
I&#039;d go on with the other million reasons this can never replace a laptop, but I don&#039;t have that kind of free time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you people out of your minds? I could write books to respond to all of these posts, but I’ll stick to the original.<br />
1.“For $10 more for an iPad I get:<br />
–8x the storage<br />
–a color screen<br />
–a touch screen<br />
–a touch OS<br />
–a better web browser<br />
–a better media player (iTunes)<br />
–works on my home/work/plane wifi network<br />
–the ability to download apps that do other things like play Scrabble and do Crosswords“<br />
I don’t know if you’ve lived under a rock for the past couple of years, but the Ipod Touch does all this…for just a few bucks under $500.</p>
<p>2.“Still think it’s a shitty device? That Apple didn’t “try hard enough”? You aren’t the target. Reader buyers are. ” You do realize that if it were intended to be FOR readers, that the reading applications would be the number one topic discussed when the device was released? Yes it will be one of the best reading devices out there, but because it is coming from apple, and because it has all the other capabilities that make it more than just a reader, it can’t just be good at one minor thing. It has made 0 improvements from the latest item released, the IPhone/ITouch besides being bigger. </p>
<p>3.“The final piece of this for me is that $499 is a killer price for something that could replace a laptop for the most casual of users. In this category I include people who surf and do email, with some light productivity needs“<br />
Replace a laptop!? You have got to be joking. Lets go over a quick list of what my shitty 5 year old laptop collecting dust on my shelf can do that the Ipad cannot (lets not get into new devices, cause that wouldn’t be fair…). 1-USB, nuff said. 2-alternate resolutions for the so called “amazing movie viewing experience, in 4:3″. 3-FLASH, how can you leave that out of any browsing device in today’s age? 4-Video camera. 5-Ability to install any software that apple has made AND any other companies! God forbid I dare ask for software that the app store cannot provide me. How dare I. 6-A real keyboard. Ok the touch keyboard is sweet, but it will not be fun on those wrists using it at the awakward angles. There is an attachment for a full keyboard, but why buy something that any computer should come with?<br />
I’d go on with the other million reasons this can never replace a laptop, but I don’t have that kind of free time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grover Dill</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2010/01/29/whos-gonna-buy-that/comment-page-1/#comment-33014</link>
		<dc:creator>Grover Dill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/?p=3541#comment-33014</guid>
		<description>I have a Kindle DX that I use exclusively for technical PDFs (I got tired of being expected to print out 500 pages of technical documentation for some product in order to be able to learn how to use it). From a pure reader standpoint, I&#039;m not sure that I expect an iPad to be better. My main considerations for a device like this are readability and battery life, and I think it&#039;s difficult for an backlit LCD screen to compete with e-Ink as far as those things go. For heavy duty reader use, I don&#039;t think an iPad is necessarily the answer.

That said, there are literally hundreds of useful things the iPad can do that are completely impossible on a Kindle DX, for a similar price. To my mind, that makes the iPad a far better overall value, despite its shortcomings as a dedicated reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Kindle DX that I use exclusively for technical PDFs (I got tired of being expected to print out 500 pages of technical documentation for some product in order to be able to learn how to use it). From a pure reader standpoint, I’m not sure that I expect an iPad to be better. My main considerations for a device like this are readability and battery life, and I think it’s difficult for an backlit LCD screen to compete with e-Ink as far as those things go. For heavy duty reader use, I don’t think an iPad is necessarily the answer.</p>
<p>That said, there are literally hundreds of useful things the iPad can do that are completely impossible on a Kindle DX, for a similar price. To my mind, that makes the iPad a far better overall value, despite its shortcomings as a dedicated reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: southerngirl</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2010/01/29/whos-gonna-buy-that/comment-page-1/#comment-33012</link>
		<dc:creator>southerngirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/?p=3541#comment-33012</guid>
		<description>Make that &quot;computing device&quot;. D@mn iPhone keyboard. ;  )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make that “computing device”. D@mn iPhone keyboard. ;  )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: southerngirl</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2010/01/29/whos-gonna-buy-that/comment-page-1/#comment-33011</link>
		<dc:creator>southerngirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/?p=3541#comment-33011</guid>
		<description>In reference to &quot;your mom&quot; reference: not sure what generation of mom you are referring to- a mom like me who has been a Mac support person at a large university for 20 years and knows and loves her gadgets or my 87 year old mother who wouldn&#039;t touch any kind of computind device for love or money?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reference to “your mom” reference: not sure what generation of mom you are referring to– a mom like me who has been a Mac support person at a large university for 20 years and knows and loves her gadgets or my 87 year old mother who wouldn’t touch any kind of computind device for love or money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: southerngirl</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2010/01/29/whos-gonna-buy-that/comment-page-1/#comment-33010</link>
		<dc:creator>southerngirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/?p=3541#comment-33010</guid>
		<description>Interesting NYT piece on Ipad name:

http://tinyurl.com/y95moh3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting NYT piece on Ipad name:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/y95moh3" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/y95moh3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garrett Guillotte</title>
		<link>http://blurbomat.com/2010/01/29/whos-gonna-buy-that/comment-page-1/#comment-33009</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrett Guillotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blurbomat.com/?p=3541#comment-33009</guid>
		<description>Screen&#039;s too small for my mom. She&#039;s already said she doesn&#039;t want one. She got her hands on an iPhone once and didn&#039;t understand why it even existed. It&#039;s a phone, she says! Why does it do all this stuff a computer with a nice big screen is for?

If the pad had come out first, she&#039;d probably get it, or at least understand it. The weird thing is that she looks at this and says it&#039;s a huge iPhone, and thus is inscrutable to her.

The one feature that would&#039;ve shut up every nerd, though? DisplayPort input, like the iMac. A locked-down $500 internet pad is a yawner, but secondary displays are like hookers and crack to a nerd. Don&#039;t need them, probably even being close to them is bad for you, but damn, son, look at her _bezel_. Look at it!

Also, does Amazon really give a crap about the Kindle as hardware? I thought they were making their money off selling books - thus Kindle on PC, Kindle on iPhone, Kindle on toasters, Kindle on diapers, Kindle on bound sheafs of paper, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Screen’s too small for my mom. She’s already said she doesn’t want one. She got her hands on an iPhone once and didn’t understand why it even existed. It’s a phone, she says! Why does it do all this stuff a computer with a nice big screen is for?</p>
<p>If the pad had come out first, she’d probably get it, or at least understand it. The weird thing is that she looks at this and says it’s a huge iPhone, and thus is inscrutable to her.</p>
<p>The one feature that would’ve shut up every nerd, though? DisplayPort input, like the iMac. A locked-down $500 internet pad is a yawner, but secondary displays are like hookers and crack to a nerd. Don’t need them, probably even being close to them is bad for you, but damn, son, look at her _bezel_. Look at it!</p>
<p>Also, does Amazon really give a crap about the Kindle as hardware? I thought they were making their money off selling books — thus Kindle on PC, Kindle on iPhone, Kindle on toasters, Kindle on diapers, Kindle on bound sheafs of paper, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/18 queries in 0.011 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 649/663 objects using memcached

Served from: blurbomat.com @ 2012-05-24 04:58:22 -->
