Comments on: dooce® Update http://blurbomat.com/archives/2007/11/28/dooce%c2%ae-update/ Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:40:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: foxygreen http://blurbomat.com/archives/2007/11/28/dooce%c2%ae-update/#comment-22580 foxygreen Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:12:08 +0000 http://blurbomat.com/archives/2007/11/28/dooce%c2%ae-update/#comment-22580 yaay iPhone! yaay iPhone!

]]> By: Tarbender http://blurbomat.com/archives/2007/11/28/dooce%c2%ae-update/#comment-22539 Tarbender Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:49:22 +0000 http://blurbomat.com/archives/2007/11/28/dooce%c2%ae-update/#comment-22539 Thanks for the cache fix. All that clicking was making me tired. It didn't stop me though, gotta have my daily Dooce! I love the new look! Thanks for the cache fix. All that clicking was making me tired. It didn’t stop me though, gotta have my daily Dooce! I love the new look!

]]> By: MB http://blurbomat.com/archives/2007/11/28/dooce%c2%ae-update/#comment-22536 MB Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:11:24 +0000 http://blurbomat.com/archives/2007/11/28/dooce%c2%ae-update/#comment-22536 How about a link to Blurbomat? How about a link to Blurbomat?

]]> By: Lesley http://blurbomat.com/archives/2007/11/28/dooce%c2%ae-update/#comment-22530 Lesley Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:27:11 +0000 http://blurbomat.com/archives/2007/11/28/dooce%c2%ae-update/#comment-22530 <i>Also, the right sidebar is far too bare for my tastes.</i> I had this same impression at first, but then I have Adblock Plus turned on so it's definitely barer than it would be for someone without that plugin. Also, the right sidebar is far too bare for my tastes.

I had this same impression at first, but then I have Adblock Plus turned on so it’s definitely barer than it would be for someone without that plugin.

]]> By: Lesley http://blurbomat.com/archives/2007/11/28/dooce%c2%ae-update/#comment-22529 Lesley Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:24:26 +0000 http://blurbomat.com/archives/2007/11/28/dooce%c2%ae-update/#comment-22529 Love the new look: specifically, the black banner at the top and the menu...very classy looking. I love the size of the photos and that we now get three. Very awesome. I miss[ed]: having the links on the sidebar but have adapted to them being in the body and besides, the labelling makes it everything accessible anyway. Love the new look: specifically, the black banner at the top and the menu…very classy looking. I love the size of the photos and that we now get three. Very awesome.

I miss[ed]: having the links on the sidebar but have adapted to them being in the body and besides, the labelling makes it everything accessible anyway.

]]> By: blurb http://blurbomat.com/archives/2007/11/28/dooce%c2%ae-update/#comment-22528 blurb Fri, 30 Nov 2007 03:24:29 +0000 http://blurbomat.com/archives/2007/11/28/dooce%c2%ae-update/#comment-22528 @<a href="http://blurbomat.com/archives/2007/11/28/dooce®-update/#22525" rel="nofollow">paul in kirkland</a>, nope. Sounds like a browser cache issue. My Google Reader shows updated feeds with photos. Shift-refresh a whole bunch? With Google Reader there are a couple of layers. I'd also click the Refresh button that's part of Google Reader. @paul in kirkland, nope. Sounds like a browser cache issue. My Google Reader shows updated feeds with photos. Shift-refresh a whole bunch? With Google Reader there are a couple of layers. I’d also click the Refresh button that’s part of Google Reader.

]]> By: Jessica http://blurbomat.com/archives/2007/11/28/dooce%c2%ae-update/#comment-22527 Jessica Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:55:32 +0000 http://blurbomat.com/archives/2007/11/28/dooce%c2%ae-update/#comment-22527 That ElfYourself things is HYSTERICAL. That ElfYourself things is HYSTERICAL.

]]> By: paul in kirkland http://blurbomat.com/archives/2007/11/28/dooce%c2%ae-update/#comment-22525 paul in kirkland Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:43:36 +0000 http://blurbomat.com/archives/2007/11/28/dooce%c2%ae-update/#comment-22525 What's the expected time between a post and the feed getting updated? I still don't see today's posts in Google Reader, but they've been on the site quite a while now. I have no idea if it's supposed to be that slow or not, so I thought I'd let you know. What’s the expected time between a post and the feed getting updated? I still don’t see today’s posts in Google Reader, but they’ve been on the site quite a while now.

I have no idea if it’s supposed to be that slow or not, so I thought I’d let you know.

]]> By: blurb http://blurbomat.com/archives/2007/11/28/dooce%c2%ae-update/#comment-22524 blurb Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:31:35 +0000 http://blurbomat.com/archives/2007/11/28/dooce%c2%ae-update/#comment-22524 @<a href="http://blurbomat.com/archives/2007/11/28/dooce®-update/#22523" rel="nofollow">De in D.C.</a>, that is the intended feed for now. Given the amount of imagery and the size of the images, the choice was made to provide a thumbnail so that feed readers and our server didn't bog down on the big images. No hating. Just letting you know that thumbnails are a choice we made, not a bug. @De in D.C., that is the intended feed for now. Given the amount of imagery and the size of the images, the choice was made to provide a thumbnail so that feed readers and our server didn’t bog down on the big images.

No hating. Just letting you know that thumbnails are a choice we made, not a bug.

]]> By: De in D.C. http://blurbomat.com/archives/2007/11/28/dooce%c2%ae-update/#comment-22523 De in D.C. Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:20:20 +0000 http://blurbomat.com/archives/2007/11/28/dooce%c2%ae-update/#comment-22523 Using Google Reader on Firefox, the Daily Photos are showing up as the thumbnail in the reader instead of the actual photo. I don't know if you were aware of this or not, but it looks like it needs some more tweaking (please don't hate me!). Using Google Reader on Firefox, the Daily Photos are showing up as the thumbnail in the reader instead of the actual photo. I don’t know if you were aware of this or not, but it looks like it needs some more tweaking (please don’t hate me!).

]]>