The Promise of Early Spring
February 27th, 2008Taken last week just after the snowstorm(s). The trees know something and after the days of gray skies and inversion, I want to believe they know that spring is coming. Eventually.
Taken with the 70-200 f4. o
-
This entry is filed under image. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You may leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed. Please read the Terms of Service before leaving a response.
February 27th, 2008 at 7:36 am
Not to make you jealous or anything, but its 15 degrees Celcius here and the tulips have started to bloom
Quite a change for the UK really. Last February we didn’t see a day without gales, and April was the hottest month of the year! Funny thing, global warming…
February 27th, 2008 at 8:02 am
Ah, the inversion. I don’t miss that lovely part of Utah weather one tiny bit.
February 27th, 2008 at 8:29 am
We just got another 18 inches of snow . . .
February 27th, 2008 at 8:40 am
We just got dumped on again, with more in the forecast.
I love it, though. Love, love love.
February 27th, 2008 at 9:29 am
Winters like this one have prompted me to move from Maine to Hawaii. I leave next week, thank God.
Someday, with your oodles of free time (note sarcasm), I think I speak for most of your readers when I say I’d love to know what’s in your photography arsenal and why, and what you think of the lenses. Inquiring minds want to point to your blog and say “Husband, Blurbomat says this lens is a good one and, uh, we should get it.”
February 27th, 2008 at 10:10 am
The trees are reacting to the longer daylight hours….or at least the longer periods of lighter gray sky vs. complete dark.
February 27th, 2008 at 11:34 am
Pretty photo - believe it or not, the trees here in Arkansas must know something we don’t. Not a bud in sight, and the daffodils are still hiding. Odd.
February 27th, 2008 at 3:32 pm
Lovely photo. Any particular reason you went with the f4.0 instead of the 2.8?
February 27th, 2008 at 10:23 pm
@Summer, size and money. The more expensive 2.8 is substantially beefier and heavier. Since this is a new focal length for us, I thought it might be good to not spend a lot and see how it goes. It is a great lens so far.
February 27th, 2008 at 11:45 pm
You have no idea how HAPPY I am to see buds on a tree in Utah! Maybe my side of the neighborhood is still too dark to coax the buds out of the trees in my yard…