This entry is filed under link. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
3 Responses to “Hitchens Goes for Obama”
Lesley says:
My Goodness, how Hitchens has changed. (I still despise this hypocritical Bush-torture-enthusiast, but maybe cutting out the booze and cigarettes has brought him to his senses.)
I read alot of Christopher Hitchens columns. For someone as conservative as he is to write a column such as this is about the Republican candidates that are running for president is very telling about those candidates. I think that the haze that he’s been in has cleared since he’s quit the booze and cigarettes.
Considering his stance with terroists, i.e “I used to call myself a single-issue voter on the essential question of defending civilization against its terrorist enemies and their totalitarian protectors, and on that “issue” I hope I can continue to expose and oppose any ambiguity.” I’m sure he shares the same fear as Sam Harris (http://www.newsweek.com/id/160080/output/print) in that having Palin in a position of real power could be a self-fulfilling prophecy of “end of days”. Although I disgree with McCain, I can understand why some like him; but Palin? I don’t understand people like faydean and why they fawn all over her (and claiming to be an athiest, at that!).
My Goodness, how Hitchens has changed. (I still despise this hypocritical Bush-torture-enthusiast, but maybe cutting out the booze and cigarettes has brought him to his senses.)
I read alot of Christopher Hitchens columns. For someone as conservative as he is to write a column such as this is about the Republican candidates that are running for president is very telling about those candidates. I think that the haze that he’s been in has cleared since he’s quit the booze and cigarettes.
Considering his stance with terroists, i.e “I used to call myself a single-issue voter on the essential question of defending civilization against its terrorist enemies and their totalitarian protectors, and on that “issue” I hope I can continue to expose and oppose any ambiguity.” I’m sure he shares the same fear as Sam Harris (http://www.newsweek.com/id/160080/output/print) in that having Palin in a position of real power could be a self-fulfilling prophecy of “end of days”. Although I disgree with McCain, I can understand why some like him; but Palin? I don’t understand people like faydean and why they fawn all over her (and claiming to be an athiest, at that!).